Aide en Philo

The US right to bear a weapons (argument)

Publié le 09/02/2023

Extrait du document

« Hello, I’ m Jonas and i’m a journalist.

In this interview, we will focus on the US right to bear a weapons which is one of the most debated.

In fact this right.

This is a very important subject and that's the reason why i took care to bring 2 persons who are just here and have opposite opinion.

Natanyel is a defender of this right and Ethel is strongly against that right I let you present yourself Intro de vous 2 (je suis … et je fais …) Okay First, Natanyel, I would like you to tell me what’s the story of this right? Historical.

The first state in the United States to pass control legislation was New York in 1911.

Gun ownership has been a subject of much contention for the past century.

Although this last is proving its usefulness in this country.

For example, the creation of the United States is made thanks to the weapons and the soldier.

So this right is inscribed in the history of the United States of America and nobody will try to remove-it ! Thank you, Ethel.

Is there any correction you wanna bring ? Yes! Barack Obama tried to change the constitution in order to regulate this because of all the school shootings. Do you think that the right to bear a weapon is really necessary for the United States ? Yes I think that this is really important for the civil’s security in the waiting for the policies during an attack For example example in texas one out of 5 attacks is stopped by an armed citizen I believe that everybody has the right to defend himself alone in case of a danger So in your opinion, the right to defend oneself is not legitimate? In the US guns are more used to cause damage than to defend ourself For exemples, in 2018 in FLorida,1 shooting was recorded every 60 hours. This madness lasts for a long time.

The 16th of October 1991, George Hennard killed 23 persons in a restaurant after shouting: “THis is what.... »

↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓

Liens utiles