The Handmaid's Tale - Censorship
Publié le 27/02/2025
Extrait du document
«
STATION 1
GENERAL INFORMATION AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Watch the video entitled “Censorship in the USA (Censored EP 104)” by Octopie
STATION 2
BANNED BOOKS WEEK
STATION 3
THE HAYES CODES
STATION 4
CHALLENGES TO THE BOOK
1990
In the Cotati-Rohnert Park Unified School district of California, The Handmaid’s Tale was challenged as a
reading assignment by a twelfth-grade English student’s parent for supposedly containing ‘sexually explicit’
passages.
The parent underlined the passages that she objected to and presented them to the Rancho Cotati High
School’s Site Level Review Committee for review.
A local minister also called for the book’s removal from the
curriculum on the grounds that the viewpoint character is a woman—‘young men were unable to relate to her.
The book was ultimately retained on the curriculum.
1992
Parents from Waterloo schools in Iowa challenged the book as ‘optional’ reading for twelfth-grade English
students.
Their complaints cited ‘profanity, lurid passages about sex, and statements defamatory to minorities,
God, women, and the disabled’ as well as the depiction of religion as an ‘oppressive force’[ix].
The student
body president at West High School argued the challenge was an act of censorship and a ‘direct assault on the
individual liberties’.
The school board voted six-to-one, ultimately rejecting the complaints.
Unsatisfied
protestors appealed to the Iowa Department of Education, but as school districts have authority to determine
reading lists, the book was retained.
1993
In Massachusetts, the book was removed from English class reading lists at Chicopee High School for
containing profanity and sex.
1998
Among several other books that were deemed ‘poor-quality literature’, the book was challenged in Richland
High School, Washington, by a group of ‘concerned citizens’ who wanted the works removed from the
classroom ‘to protect others from the dangers of what they have deemed obscene materials’.
The challengers
claim the book supposedly promotes suicide, illicit sex, violence and ‘hopelessness’.
In one request for
reconsideration, the challengers describe Atwood as ‘blasphemous’ and accuse her of belittling and degrading
the Bible.
1999
A teacher and parent from George D Chamberlain High School in Tampa, Florida protested the book’s
inclusion in the school curriculum, citing examples of sexually graphic passages.
The school committee
addressed the concerns and agreed The Handmaid’s Tale was suitable for the advanced placement English list.
2000
The book was changed from ‘required’ to ‘optional’ on a summer reading list for eleventh-grade students in the
Upper Moreland School District near Philadelphia because its subject matter was considered ‘ageinappropriate’.
2001
A group of parents from a school in Dripping Springs, Texas, considered the book anti-Christian and were
offended by passages describing sexual encounters.
The school board decided to make the book optional
reading for senior Advanced Placement English students.
2006
Following complaints from parents in the Judson Independent School District of Texas that the book was
‘sexually explicit’ and ‘offensive to Christians’, the....
»
↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓
Liens utiles
- The Buddha of suburbia
- corpus déshumanisation hlp terminale - Tale HLP Corpus n°2 : L’expérience de la déshumanisation
- the stolen generation
- Is there one side of the coin in the myth of the frontier?
- The impact of social media on our societies through the changes in lifestyles, diversity and human rights.