Devoir de Philosophie

Encyclopedia of Philosophy: THE ATOMISTS

Publié le 09/01/2010

Extrait du document

 Democritus was the first significant philosopher to be born in mainland Greece: he came from Abdera, in the north-eastern corner of the country. He was a pupil of one Leucippus, about whom little is known. The two philosophers are commonly mentioned together in antiquity, and the atomism which made both of them famous was probably Leucippus’ invention. Aristotle tells us that Leucippus was trying to reconcile the data of the senses with Eleatic monism, that is, the theory that there was only one everlasting, unchanging Being.

Leucippus thought he had a theory which was consistent with sense-perception and would not do away with coming to be and passing away or with motion and the multiplicity of things. He conceded thus much to appearances, but he agreed with the Monists that there could be no motion without void, and that the void was Unbeing and no part of Being, since Being was an absolute plenum. But there was not just one Being, but many, infinite in number and invisible because of the minuteness of their mass.

« Democritus wrote on ethics as well as physics: the sayings which have been handed down to us suggest that as a moralist he was edifying rather than inspiring.

The following remark, sensible but unexciting, is typical of many:Be satisfied with what you have, and do not spend your time dreaming of acquisitions which excite envy and admiration; look at the lives of thosewho are poor and in distress, so that what you have and own may appear great and enviable. A man who is lucky in his son-in-law, he said, gains a son, while one who is unlucky loses a daughter – a remark that has been quoted unwittingly, and often in garbled form, by many a speaker at a wedding breakfast.

Many a political reformer, too, has echoed his sentiment that it is better to be poor in a demo cracy than prosperous in a dictatorship. The sayings which have been preserved do not add up to a systematic morality, and they do not seem to have any connection with the atomic theory which underlies his philosophy.

However, some of his dicta, brief and banal as they may appear, are sufficient, if true, to overturn whole systems of moral philosophy.

For instance,The good person not only refrains from wrongdoing but does not even desire it.conflicts with the often held view that virtue is at its highest when it triumphs over conflicting passion.

Again, It is better to suffer wrong than to inflict it. cannot be reconciled with the utilitarian view, widespread in the modern world, that morality should take account only of the consequences of an action, not the identity of the agent. In late antiquity, and in the Renaissance, Democritus was known as the laugh ing philosopher, while Heraclitus was known as the weeping philosopher. Neither description seems very solidly based.

However, there are remarks attributed to Democritus which support his claim to cheerfulness, notably A life without feasting is like a highway without inns.. »

↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓

Liens utiles